Home⇛International Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studies⇛vol. 2 no. 2 (2026)

Elementary Practice Teachers’ Preparedness and Institutional Support in the Transition to the MATATAG Curriculum

Kimberly Inaldo

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

1 Pangasinan State University - Bayambang Campus, Philippines * kinaldo@psu. edu.ph Volume 2, Issue 2, June 2026 The implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum in the Philippines represents a significant educational reform aimed at strengthening foundational learning and improving overall student outcomes. As with any curriculum transition, its success largely depends on teachers' preparedness and the level of institutional support provided. However, elementary practice teachers, who are in the critical stage of pre-service training and field exposure, may experience varying degrees of readiness and support during this transition. This study aimed to assess elementary practice teachers' preparedness and institutional support in the transition to the MATATAG Curriculum. A quantitative descriptive research design was employed involving 87 elementary practice teachers selected through total enumeration. Data were gathered using a researcher-made questionnaire covering professional development and training, resource availability, self-efficacy and attitudes, concerns and challenges, overall readiness, and institutional support. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, weighted means, and standard deviations, were used to analyze the data. Results revealed that elementary practice teachers were generally prepared across all dimensions of preparedness, including training, resources, self-efficacy, and readiness. They demonstrated positive attitudes and moderate confidence in handling curriculum demands. However, institutional support was rated as highly needed, particularly in areas such as additional training, access to instructional and digital resources, collaborative opportunities, administrative feedback, and support for Inaldo, IJTMS, 2 (2), 783-804, 2026 784 1.



References:

  1. Abrigo, M. R. M., Lingatong, E. E., Daga, E. D. J. C., Apostol, G. C., Cagasan, L. P. Jr., Gavan, D. S. A., Paquibot, J. L., Perez, T. D. W., & Relos, C. M. L. (2025). Promise and growing pains in curriculum reform: A mixed-methods evaluation of MATATAG K to 10 curriculum’s first-year pilot implementation. Philippine Institute for Development Studies Discussion Paper Series, DP 2025-53. https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2025.53
  2. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2022). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://www.cengage.com/c/introduction-to-research-in-education-10e-aryjacobs-sorensen-walker/9781337566001/
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-08589-000
  4. British Educational Research Association. (2021). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2021
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=335ZDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT16&dq=Creswell,+J.+W.,+%26+Creswell,+J.+D.+(2018).+Research+design:+Qualitative,+quantitative,++and+mixed+methods+approaches+(5th+ed.).+Sage+Publications.&ots=YEAPKIvmvF&sig=XmkphV3wmQmGacR_HCxM4MWDmZ4
  6. Collie, R. J. (2021). COVID-19 and teachers’ somatic burden, stress, and emotional exhaustion: Examining the role of principal leadership and workplace buoyancy. AERA Open, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420986187
  7. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professionaldevelopment-report
  8. Department of Education (DepEd). (2023). MATATAG K to 10 curriculum framework. Government of the Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph/matatag-curriculum/
  9. Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515
  10. Elardo, A. L. A. (2025). Teachers’ preparedness, needs and challenges in the implementation of MATATAG curriculum. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(5), 334–337. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2025.v05i05.020
  11. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  12. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2019). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
  13. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2023). How to design and evaluate research in education (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://studentebookhub.com/wpcontent/uploads/2024/preview/9781259913839.pdf
  14. Fuentes, M. (2025). Teacher experiences, challenges, and support needs in the implementation of the Philippine MATATAG curriculum. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(12), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.716
  15. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press. https://moodletest.ncnu.edu.tw/pluginfile.php/1204694/mod_resource/content/1/The%20New%20Meaning%20of%20Educational%20Change%2C%20Fourth%20Edition%20%28%20PDFDrive%20%29.pdf
  16. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press. https://www.academia.edu/download/95919036/professional-capitaltransforming-teaching-in-every-school-by-andy-hargreaves-michael-fullan-0807753327.pdf
  17. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
  18. Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. (2020). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://stikespanritahusada.ac.id/wpcontent/uploads/2017/04/Marguerite_G._Lodico_Dean_T._Spaulding_KatherinBookFi.pdf
  19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals: OECD findings from TALIS 2018. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en
  20. Taherdoost, H. (2020). Sampling methods in research methodology. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 9(1), 18–27. https://hal.science/hal-02546796/document
  21. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  22. Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2021). A comprehensive analysis of pre-service teachers’ readiness for technology integration. Computers & Education, 150, 103840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103840
  23. UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report: Teachers and teaching. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/2022-teachers
  24. Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
  25. Villaver, J., et al. (2024). MATATAG curriculum rollout: Understanding challenges for effective implementation. Philippine Education Review, 12(3), 45–60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381801014_MATATAG_Curriculum_Rollout_Understan ding_Challenges_for_Effective_Implementation
  26. World Bank. (2021). Improving teacher effectiveness in education systems. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/teachers
  27. Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic