Home⇛International Journal of Transformative Multidisciplinary Studies⇛vol. 2 no. 2 (2026)

Pagkakaiba ng Paggamit ng Wikang Meranaw batay sa Henerasyon: Pananaw ng mga Gurong Generation X sa Konteksto ng Klasrum

Rohannie Mamongcal | Cherry Mae Villastique | Nadjerah Exsan | Cj Ann Bala | Alican Pandapatan

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Ang bawat wika ay nagbabago sa bawat henerasyon, hal., Wikang Meranaw. Nilalayon ng pananaliksik na ito na alamin ang ugnayan ng wika at edad sa konteksto ng klasrum. Inalam ang paggamit ng mga mag-aaral sa Wikang Meranaw ng mga Gen Z at Millennials sa pamamagitan ng pananaw at karanasan ng mga gurong Gen X. Gamit ang kwalitatibong disenyo, partikular ang Phenomenological Approach, ay inilarawan ang pananaw at karanasan ng mga guro sa paggamit ng Wikang Meranaw. Lumabas sa pag-aaral na ang edad ay maaaring makaapekto sa paggamit ng wika sa paglipas ng panahon. Ilan sa naging resulta ng pag-aaral ay ang pagbabago sa estilo ng wika, bokabularyo, gramatika, pormalidad ng wika, at sa paraan ng pagsasalita ng mga mag-aaral. Dagdag pa rito, lumabas din sa pag-aaral na ang social media at teknolohiya ay may malaking impluwensiya sa pagbabagong naganap sa Wikang Meranaw ng bawat mag- aaral. Ang pag-aaral na ito ay nakatuon lamang sa konteksto at pananaw ng limang Gen X na guro sa paggamit ng Wikang Meranaw ng mga mag-aaral ng Gen Z at Millennials. Dahil dito, inirerekomenda ng mananaliksik na magkaroon ng mas malawak na pag-aaral at mas maraming bilang ng respondente upang mas makita ang pagbabagong naganap sa wika, partikular sa Wikang Meranaw, sa loob ng klasrum. Susing-salita: Gen Z, millennials, klasrum, karanasan, pananaw, wikang Meranaw, teknolohiya, social media



References:

  1. Bencsik, A., Horváth-Csikós, G., & Juhász, T. (2016). Y and Z generations at workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(3), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.03.06
  2. Byrne, M. M. (2001). Understanding life experiences through a phenomenological approach to research. AORN Journal, 73(4), 830-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(06)61812-7
  3. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com/books/about/Qualitative_Inquiry_and_Research_Design.html?id=Ykruxor10cYC
  4. Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487002
  5. Jebaselvi, C., Mohanraj, K., Thangamani, A., & Kumar, M. (2023). The impact of social media on the evolution of language and communication trends. Shanlax International Journal of English, 12(1), 41-44. https://doi.org/10.34293/english.v12i1.6725
  6. Jenkins, J. (2015). Global Englishes: A resource book for students (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761596
  7. Jeresano, E. M., & Carretero, M. D. (2022). Digital culture and social media slang of Gen Z. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 3(4), 11-25. https://uijrt.com/paper/digital-culture-social-media-slang-gen-z
  8. Juli, A., Suci, M. S., & Esti, A. (2024). The discourse of Gen Z in social media network: Inputs to English language teaching. Semantik: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya, 2(3), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.61132/semantik.v2i3.792
  9. LeDuc, D. (2019). Generation Z: A new post-Millennial generation is beginning to take shape and is looking like the most demographically diverse ever. Trust Magazine. https://www.pew.org/en/trust/archive/spring-2019/who-is-generation-z
  10. Maghirang, T. (2019). Get ready for tech-savvy Gen Z! The Manila Times. https://www.manilatimes.net/2019/03/24/business/sunday-business-i-t/get-ready-for-tech-savvygen-z/530014
  11. Moremen, C., Hoogsteden, J., & Birrell, E. (2024). Generational differences in understandings of privacy terminology. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2024(3), 589-605. https://doi.org/10.56553/popets-2024-0094
  12. Nobleta, V., & Eliaga, C. (2024). Ang mga morpolohikal na proseso ng mga salitang Gen Z. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 13(16), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2024.24831
  13. Pandapatan, A. M., Pandapatan, S. A. T., Hussain, B. S., Hadji Jamel, A. J. A., Hadji Socor, N. U., Abaton, S. Z. M., Singer, N. H., Ali, A. A., Ampuan, I. M., & Alangca-Azis, J. D. (2026). Meranaw language vitality in select Lanao municipalities: A preliminary assessment. Rainbow: Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Cultural Studies, 15(1), 21-31. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/rainbow
  14. Pandapatan, A. M., Ali, A. A., Macarambon, A. T., Altamia, C. G., Ramos, N. U., Hadji Socor, N. U., Abaton, S. Z. M., & Pantao, A. G. (2025). Language vitality case of Higaonon language in Rogongon, Iligan City. European Journal of Science, Innovation and Technology, 4(6), 92-106. https://ejsit-journal.com/index.php/ejsit/article/view/580
  15. Smith, J. A., Larkin, M., & Flowers, P. (2021). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/5282221
  16. Soriano, C. R., & Cabalquinto, E. C. (2022). Philippine digital cultures: Brokerage dynamics on YouTube. https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5384615&publisher=FZ0675
  17. Sydnor, W. (2023). Concerning the different pronunciations of "our," how does the pronunciation affect people of generational and foreign language background differences? Journal of Student Research, 12(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370515604_Concerning_the_different_pronunciations_of_our_how_does_the_pronunciation_affect_people_of_generational_and_foreign_language_background_differences
  18. Wiedmer, T. (2015). Generations do differ: Best practices in leading traditionalists, boomers, and generations X, Y, and Z. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 82(1). https://www.proquest.com/docview/1770514324?accounted=458
  19. Yang, Y. (2024). Research on the impact of internet language on communication. Communications in Humanities Research, 46, 162-166. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/46/20242298