Elementary Teachers' Capacity Levels for Design Thinking and Peeragogy: Basis for a Proposed Set of Learning Action Cell Sessions
Ma. Theresa B. Perez | Joseph Christian Gesmundo
Discipline: Teacher Training
Abstract:
This study employed a descriptive research method to gather
data on the capacities of elementary teachers in Santo Tomas City,
Batangas, Philippines, to implement Design Thinking and engage in
Peeragogy. Utilizing a stratified sample of 238 teachers, the study used a
validated and reliable researcher-made questionnaire to assess
demographic profiles, awareness of Futures Thinking, and Peeragogy
capacity levels. Findings indicate that teachers exhibit very high
capacities in both methodologies, with no significant differences based on
sex, age, educational attainment, or years in service. A moderate positive
correlation between the capacities for Design Thinking and Peeragogy
suggests overlapping competencies. Continuous professional development
and adequate organizational support were identified as critical for
enhancing these capacities. The study recommends targeted Learning
Action Cell sessions to foster a collaborative and innovative teaching
environment. These sessions aim to provide practical strategies and
continuous support to further enhance teachers' skills and integration of
these methodologies, ultimately improving educational outcomes.
References:
- Department of Education. (2017). Guidelines on Learning Action Cell (LAC) as a K to 12 basic education program school-based continuing professional development strategy for the improvement of teaching and learning. Department of Education, Philippines.
- Dosi, C., Rosati, F., & Vignoli, M. (2018). Measuring design thinking mindset. In DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference (pp. 1991–2002). The Design Society.
- Gubac, L. M., & Pascual, L. C. (2018). Emotional labor among elementary school teachers in the Philippines: Challenges and coping strategies. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 52–64.
- Guribye, F., & Lindström, B. (2017). Peer-learning in higher education: Unpacking key dimensions and relations. Studies in Higher Education, 42(12), 2232–2248.
- Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 23–31.
- Ingersoll, R., Merrill, E., Stuckey, D., & Collins, G. (2018). Seven trends: The transformation of the teaching force. Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
- Jacobs, J. (2013). Peer learning or, the conditions of a peer in a networked learning environment. Research in Learning Technology, 21.
- Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design Thinking: A Creative Approach to Educational Problems of Practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 23-31.
- Ingersoll, R., Merrill, E., Stuckey, D., & Collins, G. (2018). Seven Trends: The Transformation of the Teaching Force. Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
- Jacobs, J. (2013). Peer learning or, the conditions of a peer in a networked learning environment. Research in Learning Technology, 21.Schmidt, P. (2013). Peeragogy handbook. PubDomEd/Pierce Press.
- Kelley, D., & Kelley, T. (2013). Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All. Crown Business.
- Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes through Cognitive Bias Reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925-938.
- Lin, Y. C., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Shen, S. (2020). Facilitating Students’ Creativity and Learning Performance: A Collaborative Design Thinking Approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100659.
- Magno, C. (2017). Challenges and disparities in elementary education: Perspectives from urban and rural schools in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Education, 96(1), 62-75.
- Santos, M., & Ramirez, J. (2019). Inclusive education practices through Learning Action Cell (LAC) sessions: A case study in Philippine public schools. Journal of Inclusive Education, 5(2), 45–60.