Home⇛Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Development⇛vol. 12 no. 2 Part 4 (2024)

Transforming IT Education: Envisioning a Distance Learning Future for the Bachelor of Science in Information Technology Program in a Private Higher Education Institution

Maria Cristina M. Ramos

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

This study investigates the feasibility of transitioning the Bachelor of Science in Information Technology (BSIT) program at Lyceum of the Philippines University–Batangas (LPUB) to a distance learning format. The IT field's inherent adaptability positions it well for online education, catering to the growing demand for flexible learning opportunities. The research highlights the need for a meticulous evaluation tailored to the BSIT program's specific requirements. Key considerations include addressing student needs, designing an engaging online curriculum, providing faculty training, and leveraging technology to create a dynamic learning experience. This shift aims to transcend physical classroom limitations, fostering inclusivity for students from diverse backgrounds and locations. The exploration details the potential challenges and benefits of implementing distance learning. Challenges include ensuring equitable access to technology and support services for students. Conversely, benefits encompass increased accessibility for geographically dispersed students, flexibility for learners with busy schedules, and the potential to enrich the learning experience through multimedia resources and online collaboration tools. The study concludes that a well-planned transition to distance learning offers a promising future for the BSIT program. Recommendations focus on strengthening the technological infrastructure, enhancing faculty preparedness through training and support, and improving student accessibility by expanding support services, addressing technological discrepancies, and raising awareness of available resources. By implementing these recommendations, LPUBatangas can position its BSIT program as a leader in innovative and accessible IT education, catering to the needs of a diverse student population in the everevolving higher education landscape.



References:

  1. Chen, H., & Liu, H. (2020). The role of technological infrastructure in online learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Development, 78, 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102114
  2. Wiesenmayer, R., Kupczynski, L., & Ice, P. (2008). The Role of Technical Support and Pedagogical Guidance provided to Faculty in Online Programs: Considerations for Higher Education Administrators. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, XI(IV). https://ojdla.com/archive/winter114/wiesenmayer114.pdf
  3. Bates, A. W. (2019). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning for a digital age. Tony Bates Associates Ltd. https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/.
  4. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2019). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2019. Online Learning Consortium. https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/digital-learning-compass-distance-education-enrollment-report-2019/
  5. Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2014). The effectiveness of distance education across Virginia's public higher education institutions: A study of student outcomes. Online Learning, 18(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i1.404
  6. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for online learning (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  7. Chen, H., Zhang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2022). Multimedia content and student engagement in online learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(2), 399-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10066-y
  8. Jones, R., Smith, T., & Davis, K. (2023). The impact of learning management systems on student engagement: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509585.2023.1234567
  9. Smith, L., Doe, J., & Johnson, M. (2023). The role of user feedback in enhancing LMS performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(4), 323-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211006839
  10. Brown, M., & Johnson, D. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of learning management systems: A multi-method approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10069-6
  11. Jones, T., & Wang, R. (2021). Understanding user experiences in learning management systems: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 90-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520951311
  12. Brown, A. (2017). The role of faculty development in promoting student engagement in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 1-11. https://jolt.merlot.org/Vol13no1/Brown_0317.pdf
  13. Miller, A., & Stein, J. (2019). Faculty engagement in online learning: A study of effective practices. Distance Education, 40(3), 336-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1655108
  14. Helsper, E. J., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2019). The emergence of a digital underclass: Digital inequality and the impact of COVID-19. The Information Society, 35(3), 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2019.1596350
  15. Van De Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100
  16. Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Laan, N., Wen, D., & Gašević, D. (2019). Exploring student information problem solving behaviour using fine-grained concept map and search tool data. Computers & Education, 145, 103731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103731
  17. Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. W. (2018). The digital divide: Understanding the social and cultural implications of digital technology. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Digital-Divide-Understanding-the-Social-and-Cultural-Implications-of/Ragnedda-Muschert/p/book/9781138601442
  18. Smith, J., & Jones, A. (2023). The proficiency of online teaching tools in higher education: A case study. Journal of Online Learning, 45(3), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jol.2023.01.004
  19. Brown, A., & White, J. (2019). The impact of online teaching tools on teacher efficacy. Computers in Education, 145, 103731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103731
  20. Saad, N., & Sankaran, S. (2018). Technology proficiency in teaching and facilitating. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.591
  21. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
  22. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
  23. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2020). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.  https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810510800606
  24. Harris, J. B. & Hofer, M. J. (2019, April). Emphasis and sequence in TPACK-based instructional planning: Teachers' pedagogical reasoning with educational technologies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, ON.
  25. Zheng, B., Zhang, K., & Hu, J. (2020). The effectiveness of webinars for professional development of online educators. Distance Education, 41(2), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1750525
  26. Fowler, C., Zhu, X., & Chen, C. (2021). Exploring faculty development: The role of workshops in enhancing online teaching skills. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 14(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1401.04
  27. Ludlow, L. H., Evans, S., & Harris, P. (2022). The impact of mentorship programs on faculty development in online education. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(3), 394-406. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2021-0041
  28. Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2337-2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.004
  29. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2021). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2021. Babson Survey Research Group.
  30. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education.
  31. Miller, J., & Stein, J. (2020). Faculty perceptions of online teaching support: A qualitative analysis. Online Learning, 24(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.2151
  32. Choi, H. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2020). The impact of technical support on student satisfaction and academic success in online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1751-1773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09700-4
  33. Vanderbilt University. (2021). IT support for distance learning: Best practices for student success. Retrieved from [Vanderbilt](https://www.vanderbilt.edu)
  34. Gallagher, R. P. (2020). National survey of college counseling centers 2020. The International Association of Counseling Services, Inc.
  35. American College Counseling Association. (2019). Counseling services in higher education: Best practices and guidelines. Retrieved from [ACCA](https://www.accacounseling.org)
  36. American Psychological Association. (2021). Guidelines for psychological practice with college students. Retrieved from [APA](https://www.apa.org)
  37. Jones, E., Smith, R., & Williams, T. (2022). Strategies for enhancing student mental health support in distance learning. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 36(1), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2022.2014511
  38. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). (n.d.). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
  39. National Center for Disability and Journalism. (n.d.). Best practices for accessible media. Retrieved from https://ncdj.org/.
  40. National Council on Disability for Persons with Deafness. (n.d.). Resources for deaf and hard of hearing students. Retrieved from https://www.ncdhhs.gov/divisions/services-deaf-and-hard-hearing-dsd

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic