HomeAsia Pacific Journal of Management and Sustainable Developmentvol. 12 no. 2 Part 2 (2024)

Arts-Based Activity Integration and Efficacy Among Chinese Teachers

Lian Yuqing | Beverly T. Caiga

Discipline: Teacher Training

 

Abstract:

This study delved into integrating arts-based activities within Chinese classrooms and its correlation with teacher efficacy. A descriptive research design was employed to examine data collected from 385 teachers. The findings revealed a prevalent use of arts-based activities among respondents, positively impacting student engagement and motivation. Teachers demonstrated confidence in their ability to implement arts integration, attributing this to effective teacher training programs and improved classroom management. Although most teacher demographics exhibited no significant differences in arts-based activity integration or teaching efficacy, the study identified a correlation between higher educational attainment and increased student engagement through arts integration. A strong positive relationship was established between arts-based activity integration and overall teaching efficacy, suggesting that incorporating arts into instruction enhances teachers’ confidence and classroom management skills. The research underscores the potential of arts-based activities to enrich the learning experience and bolster teacher effectiveness. Recommendations for future studies include longitudinal research to monitor the long-term impact of arts integration on student outcomes and teacher development. By expanding the scope of investigation to include diverse educational contexts, researchers can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the role of arts in education.



References:

  1. Goldberg, M. (2021). Arts integration: Teaching subject matter through the arts in multicultural settings. Routledge.
  2. He, F. (2023). Research on the Strategies of Cultivating the Pre-service Teachers' Ability of Art Normal Students under the Background of Contemporary Cultural Context. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 9(2), 134-138.
  3. Srivastava, A. P., Babu, V., & Shetye, S. K. (2019). Exploring students’ learning efficacy: Predicting role of teachers’ extra role behaviour and art-based innovation pedagogies. European Journal of Training and Development,43(9), 842-859.
  4. Kaplan, S. N. (2023). The grid: A model to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted. In Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 235-251). Routledge.
  5. Sunassee, A., Bokhoree, C., & Patrizio, A. (2021). Students’ empathy for the environment through eco-art place-based education: A review.Ecologies, 2(2), 214-247.
  6. Zakaria, Z., Setyosari, P., SULTON, S., & KUSWANDİ, D. (2019). The effect of art-based learning to improve teaching effectiveness in pre-service teachers. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 531-545.
  7. Martin-Beltrán, M., Durham, C., & Cataneo, A. (2023). Preservice teachers developing humanizing intercultural competence during field-based interactions: Opportunities and challenges. Teaching and Teacher Education, 124, 104008.
  8. Magill, C., Cronin, C., Walsh, B., Polman, R., & Rudd, J. (2023, June). Teaching efficacy of undergraduate PE students; what are the key predictors and what can PE educators learn from this?. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1166613). Frontiers Media SA.
  9. Rūta, G. (2021). STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN ARTS-BASED SCIENCE LEARNING. Mistectvo ta Osvita/Arts & Education, (2).
  10. Liu, K., Tang, H., & Yang, Y. (2022). The Art Education in China Under the Double Reduction Policy. In 2022 International Conference on Science Education and Art Appreciation (SEAA 2022),1305-1312. Atlantis Press.
  11. Lv, M., Zhang, H., Georgescu, P., Li, T., & Zhang, B. (2022). Improving education for innovation and entrepreneurship in Chinese technical universities: A quest for building a sustainable framework. Sustainability, 14(2), 595.
  12. Spittle, S., Spittle, M., Itoh, S., & Watt, A. P. (2023, April). Teaching efficacy of undergraduate physical education students toward concepts in physical education. In Frontiers in Education,Vol. 8, p. 1124452. Frontiers Media SA.
  13. Qiao, X., & Lai, M. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ job-related perceptions of teaching in rural areas: a study of the free teacher education programme in mainland China. Teachers and Teaching, 25(7), 782-799.
  14. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
  15. Fleming, M. (2023). Arts, language and intercultural education. Language Teaching Research, 27(2), 261-275.
  16. Robinson, K. (2020). Creative Schools: The Grassroots Revolution That’s Transforming Education. Penguin Books.
  17. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
  18. Li, J. (2020). Culturally Responsive Teaching and the Chinese Student. Journal of International Education Research.
  19. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute.
  20. Emmer, E. T., &Sabornie, E. J. (2015). Handbook of Classroom Management. Routledge.
  21. Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S., & Pickering, D. J. (2003). Classroom Management that Works: Research-Based Strategies for Every Teacher. ASCD.
  22. Colton, C. C. (2016). Exploration of Transformational Leadership and Teacher Self-Efficacy in Integrated Arts Schools (Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University).
  23. Fenton, D., & Essler-Petty, S. (2019). Self-efficacy and STEM: An integrated pedagogical approach for pre-service elementary teachers. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 10(4), 4160-4168.
  24. Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best Practices in Teachers’ Professional Development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 252-263.