Home⇛Universal Journal of Educational Research⇛vol. 4 no. 4 (2025)

Metacognitive Reading Strategies Awareness And Reading Achievements Of Moroccan Efl Learners: An Sors-Based Study

Meriem El Boukhrissi | Hind Brigui

Discipline: Education

 

Abstract:

Reading comprehension in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) is seen as a cognitively challenging process, demanding EFL learners use strategic reading methods to comprehend complex texts. Prior research (Mokhtari & Sheory, 2002) has stressed the vital role of metacognitive awareness in improving reading outcomes. This study examines Moroccan high school EFL learners' metacognitive reading strategies awareness and measures its relationship with their reading comprehension performance. The participants included 53 second-year baccalaureate students from two public high schools in Morocco. Data was collected employing a research-adapted reading test (Moroccan national exams) and the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS). The results showed that problem-solving strategies were the most frequently employed, followed by the global and support strategies. Still, Pearson correlation analysis revealed that global strategies had the most significant correlation with reading comprehension scores (r = .618, p < .001). As for the multiple regression analysis, it demonstrated that the strategy subcategories collectively predicted learners' reading comprehension achievements, reporting an approximate of 38.6% of variance (R² = .386, p < .001), yet only global strategies neared statistical significance as an independent predictor (β = .480, p = .077). These findings emphasize the essential role of strategic reading awareness, mainly of global strategies, in improving learners´ reading performance, and propose that inclusive approaches such as Universal Design for Learning (UDL) may be able to assist learners in accessing explicit strategy instruction and comprehension attainment.



References:

  1. Afflerbach, P., Ruetschlin, H., & Russell, S. (2007). Assessing strategic reading.Classroom literacy assessment: Making sense of what students know and do, 177-194.
  2. Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373.
  3. Afflerbach, P., Cho, B. Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2015). Conceptualizing and assessing higher-order thinking in reading. Theory into Practice, 54(3), 203-212.
  4. Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013). The importance of metacognitive reading strategy awareness in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 235-244.
  5. Ait Bouzid, H. (2017). An evaluation of selected Moroccan ELT textbooks: A standards-based approach perspective. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 229-238.
  6. Akhmetova, A., Imambayeva, G., & Csapó, B. (2022). Reading strategies and reading achievement in middle school: Kazakhstani young learners. Sage Open, 12(3), 21582440221113843.
  7. Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The modern language journal, 75(4), 460-472.
  9. Anderson, N. J. (2002). The Role of Metacognition in Second Language Teaching and Learning. ERIC Digest.
  10. Anderson, N. J. (2004). Metacognitive reading strategy awareness of ESL and EFL learners. The CATESOL Journal, 16(1), 11-27.
  11. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. Handbook of Reading Research, 1, 255-291.
  12. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. Handbook of Reading Research, 1, 353-394.
  13. Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463-494.
  14. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Self-regulation: An introductory overview. Handbook of self-regulation, 1-9.
  15. Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (pp. 453-481). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  16. Calero‐Breckheimer, A., & Goetz, E. T. (1993). Reading strategies of biliterate children for English and Spanish texts. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 14(3), 177-204.
  17. Cantrell, S. C., Almasi, J. F., Carter, J. C., Rintamaa, M., & Madden, A. (2010). The impact of a strategy-based intervention on the comprehension and strategy use of struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 257.
  18. Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134.
  19. Carrell, P. L. (1998). Can reading strategies be successfully taught? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 1-20.
  20. Carrell, P. L., & Alatis, J. E. (1991). Strategic reading. Georgetown University.
  21. Carrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (Eds.). (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge University Press.
  22. Carrell, P. L., Gajdusek, L., & Wise, T. (1998). Metacognition and EFL/ESL Reading. Instructional science, 26(1), 97-112.
  23. Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL quarterly, 23(4), 647-678.
  24. CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from https://udlguidelines.cast.org
  25. Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130.
  26. Chern, C. L. (1993). Chinese students’ word-solving strategies in reading in English. Second language reading and vocabulary learning, 67-85.
  27. Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Longman.
  28. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative (Vol. 7). Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  29. Devine, D. (1993). A study of reading ability groups: primary school children's experiences and views. Irish Educational Studies, 12(1), 134-142.
  30. Dhieb-Henia, N. (2006). Applying metacognitive strategies to skimming research articles in an ESP context. English Teaching Forum, 44(1), 2-7.
  31. Eskey, D. E. (2005). Reading in a second language. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 563-579). Routledge.
  32. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
  33. Gaith, G. (2018). English as a second/foreign language reading comprehension: A framework for curriculum and instruction. TESL Reporter, 50(2), 1-17.
  34. Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Ablex Publishing.
  35. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research competencies for analysis and applications.
  36. Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice, and research implications. RELC journal, 39(2), 188-213.
  37. Gorsuch, G., & Taguchi, E. (2010). Developing reading fluency and comprehension using repeated reading: Evidence from longitudinal student reports. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 27-59.
  38. Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
  39. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Pearson Education.
  40. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Teaching and researching reading. Routledge.
  41. Hudson, T. (2009). Teaching second language reading.
  42. Janzen, J. (2001). Strategic Reading on a Sustained Basis. Understanding the Courses We Teach: Local Perspectives on English Language Teaching, 369.
  43. Karbalaei, A. (2010). A comparison of the metacognitive reading strategies used by EFL and ESL readers. The Reading Matrix, 10(2), 165-180.
  44. Kern, R. G. (1997, March). L2 reading strategy training: A critical perspective. In Unpublished paper presented at the AAAL Conference, Orlando, Florida.
  45. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
  46. Koda, K. (2005). Learning to Read Across Writing Systems: Transfer, Metalinguistic Awareness, and Second Language. Second language writing systems, 11, 311.
  47. Larhmaid, M. (2023). The Impact of Reading Medium on the Comprehension and Judgment of Performance of Moroccan EFL Readers. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics.
  48. Mahdavi, J. N., & Tensfeldt, L. (2013). Untangling reading comprehension strategy instruction: Assisting struggling readers in the primary grades. Preventing school failure: Alternative education for children and youth, 57(2), 77-92.
  49. McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. (2009). Reading comprehension instruction: Focus on content or strategies. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 35(2), 28-32.
  50. Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Reichard, C. A. (2018). Revising the "Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory" (MARSI) and Testing for Factorial Invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 219-246.
  51. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259.
  52. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2004). Investigating the strategic reading processes of first- and second -language readers in two different cultural contexts. System, 32(3), 379-394.
  53. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2008). The impact of reading purpose on the use of reading strategies. Reading strategies of first-and second-language learners, 85-97.
  54. Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students' awareness of reading strategies. Journal of developmental education, 25(3), 2-11.
  55. Mouchrif, H., Mokhtari, N., & Benzehaf, B. (2024). Examining the impact of early metacognitive instruction on reading comprehension among Moroccan middle school EFL students. In EDULEARN24 Proceedings (pp. 5019-5027). IATED.
  56. Nilforoushan, S., Rashtchi, M., & Abbasian, G. R. (2023). Exploring the perceived and real metacognitive reading strategies of Iranian EFL learners: Different text types in focus. SAGE Open, 13(1), 21582440231164567.
  57. Nordin, N. M., Rashid, S. M., Zubir, S. I. S. S., & Sadjirin, R. (2013). Differences in reading strategies: How ESL learners really read. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 468-477.
  58. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.
  59. Paris, S. G., & Jacobs, J. E. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children's reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55(6), 2083-2093.
  60. Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary educational psychology, 8(3), 293-316.
  61. Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20(1), 26-56.
  62. Philip, B., & Tan, K. H. (2006). Metacognitive strategy instruction (MSI) for reading: Co-regulation of cognition. Jurnal e-Bangi, 1(1).
  63. Pookcharoen, S. (2009). Metacognitive online reading strategies among Thai EFL university students. Indiana University.
  64. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-561). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  65. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  66. Purpura, J. E. (1998). Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with high- and low-ability test takers: A structural equation modelling approach. Language Testing, 15(3), 333-379.
  67. Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning English as a foreign language: an overview. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 73-81.
  68. Samuels, S. J., & Flor, R. F. (1997). The importance of automaticity for developing expertise in reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 107-121.
  69. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). Influencing children's self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading & writing quarterly, 23(1), 7-25.
  70. Shang, H. F. (2010). Reading strategy use, self-efficacy, and EFL reading comprehension. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 18-42.
  71. Sheorey, R., & Baboczky, E. (2008). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among Hungarian college students. Reading strategies of first- and second-language learners, 161-173.
  72. Sheorey, R., Kamimura, Y., & Freiermuth, M. (2008). Reading strategies of users of English as a library language: The case of Japanese ESP students. Reading strategies of first- and second-language learners, 175-184.
  73. Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431-449.
  74. Shokrpour, N. (2009). Effects of consciousness raising of metacognitive strategies on EFL students’ reading comprehension. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 157(1), 75-92.
  75. Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Rand Corporation.
  76. Taylor, A., Stevens, J. R., & Asher, J. W. (2008). The effects of explicit reading strategy training on L2 reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. In Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 213-244). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  77. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
  78. Van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., De Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2004). Linguistic knowledge, processing speed, and metacognitive knowledge in first- and second-language reading comprehension: a componential analysis. Journal of educational psychology, 96(1), 19.
  79. Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3-14.
  80. Victori, M., & Lockhart, W. (1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23(2), 223-234.
  81. Wenden, A. L. (2014). Metacognitive knowledge in SLA: the neglected variable. In Learner contributions to language learning (pp. 44-64). Routledge.
  82. Williams, J. P., & Atkins, J. G. (2009). The role of metacognition in teaching reading comprehension to primary students. In Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 26-43). Routledge.
  83. Zare, P. (2013). Exploring reading strategy use and reading comprehension success among EFL learners. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22(11), 1566-1571.
  84. Zhang, F., Jin, C., & Fan, C. (2024). Factors influencing students’ reading literacy in Morocco: A multilevel analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-10.
  85. Zhang, L. (2014). A structural equation modeling approach to investigating test takers’ strategy use and reading test performance. The Asian EFL journal quarterly, 16(1), 153-188.
  86. Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 54-69.
  87. Zhang, L., & Wu, A. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students' metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 37-59.

Tools


Copyright © 2025  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic