Home⇛International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research⇛vol. 7 no. 2 (2026)

How Crowdfunding Shapes Venture, Product and Market Decisions: A Multiple Case Study of Philippine-based Microenterprises

Raymond Allan G. Vergara

Discipline: business and management

 

Abstract:

Microenterprises face constraints in accessing capital, markets, and entrepreneurial support systems, which limit their capacity for venture creation and growth. Crowdfunding emerged as an alternative mechanism with the potential to address these challenges; yet its role in shaping venture creation decisions remains underexplored in emerging economies. Using an exploratory, qualitative, multiple-case approach, this study examines how crowdfunding influences the venture-creation and decision-making processes of Philippine-based microentrepreneurs. Drawing on eight cases of successfully crowdfunded enterprises, the study investigates entrepreneurs’ motivations for participating in crowdfunding, their experiences before, during, and after campaigns, and the critical transition points that shape venture outcomes. Findings demonstrate that crowdfunding is a market-validation tool rather than a financial tool. While funding initially motivates participation, crowdfunding’s most significant benefits are non-financial: market and consumer insight, product feedback, brand visibility, and access to broader networks. More importantly, these resources inform decisions to launch new ventures, develop new products, enter new markets, or pivot strategically, enabling lowrisk market experimentation prior to full venture commitment. Building on these findings, the study refines crowdfunding entrepreneurial frameworks by extending commitment beyond new venture creation to include product- and market-level decisions, and contributes an alternative venture creation pathway for resourceconstrained microenterprises.



References:

  1. Agrawal,   A.   K.,   Catalini,   C.,   &   Goldfarb,   A. (2011).  The  geography  of  crowdfunding (No.  w16820). National  Bureau  of  Eco-nomic Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/674021Pre-campaign Decisions•Product ideation / opportunity recognitionCampaign Processes•Linking to Market•Product DevelopmentPost-Campaign Decisions•Entrepreneurial decision:•Commit to new venture, product, or market•Pivot to a different directionRAG Vergara,2026 /How Crowdfunding Shapes Venture, Product and Market DecisionsIJMABER 669Volume 7| Number 2| February | 2026
  2. Agrawal,  A.,  Catalini,  C.,  &  Goldfarb,  A.  (2014). Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14(1), 63-97. https://doi.org/10.1086/674021
  3. Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A.   (2014).   Crowdfunding:   Tapping   the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003
  4. Beverland,  M.,  &  Lindgreen,  A.  (2010).  What makes  a  good  case  study?  A  positivist  re-view   of   qualitative   case   research   pub-lished  in  Industrial  Marketing  Manage-ment,   1971–2006. Industrial   Marketing Management, 39(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmar-man.2008.09.005
  5. Bhave, M. P. (1994). A process model of entre-preneurial   venture   creation. Journal   of Business Venturing, 9(3), 223-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90031-0
  6. Cai, W., Polzin, F., & Stan, E. (2021). Crowdfund-ing and social capital: A systematic review using  a  dynamic  perspective. Technologi-cal   Forecasting   &   Social   Change,   162, 120412.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech-fore.2020.120412
  7. Cefis,  E.  &  Marsili,  O.  (2011).  Born  to  flip.  Exit decisions of entrepreneurial firms in high-tech  and  low-tech  industries. Journal  of Evolutionary  Economics, 21(3),  473-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-010-0210-4
  8. Cosh,  A.,  Cumming,  D.,  &  Hughes,  A.  (2009). Outside  enterpreneurial  capital. The  Eco-nomic    Journal, 119(540),    1494-1533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02270.x
  9. Eisenhardt,   K.   M.   (1989).   Building   theories from   case   study   research. Academy   of Management    Review, 14(4),    532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
  10. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal re-ports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for  describing  the  phenomenon  of  new venture   creation. Academy   of   Manage-ment Review, 10(4), 696-706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279094
  11. Doce, L. J., & Ching, M. R. (2021). Perceptions to Crowdfunding  Adoption  in  Philippines:  A Study   on   MSMEs.   In PACIS(p.   141). https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2021/141
  12. Gordon, S. R. (2012).  Action's place in the ven-ture  creation  process.  In Entrepreneurial Action(Vol.  14,  pp.  161-205).  Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1074-7540(2012)0000014009
  13. Guba,  E.  G.,  &  Lincoln,  Y.  S.  (1981).  Effective evaluation:  Improving  the  usefulness  of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass.
  14. Guba,  E.  G.,  &  Lincoln,  Y.  S.  (1994).  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative  Research(pp.  105–117).  Sage Publications, Inc.
  15. Gupta,  R.,  Pandey,  R.,  &  Sebastian,  V.  J.  (2021). International Entrepreneurial Orientation (IEO):  A  bibliometric  overview  of  schol-arly   research. Journal   of   Business   Re-search, 125, 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.005.
  16. Ito,  Y.,  &  Shahnaz,  D.  (2019). Road  map  for strengthening  social  entrepreneurship  in the Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/de-fault/files/publication/514471/adb-brief-112-social-entrepreneurship-road-map-philippines.pdf
  17. Junge,  L.  B.,  Laursen,  I.  C.,  &  Nielsen,  K.  R. (2022).  Choosing  crowdfunding:  Why  do entrepreneurs choose to engage in crowd-funding?. Technovation, 111,    102385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technova-tion.2021.102385
  18. Kickul,  J.,  Gundry,  L.  K.,  Barbosa,  S.  D.,  &  Whit-canack,  L.  (2009).  Intuition  versus  analy-sis?  Testing  differential  models  of  cogni-tive style on entrepreneurial self–efficacy and the new venture creation process. En-trepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 439-453. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00298.x.RAG Vergara,2026 /How Crowdfunding Shapes Venture, Product and Market DecisionsIJMABER670Volume 7| Number 2| February| 2026
  19. Kuusela, H., & Paul, P. (2000).  A comparison  of concurrent  and  retrospective  verbal  pro-tocol  analysis. The  American  Journal  of Psychology, 113(3), 387-404. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423365
  20. Lehner,  O.  M.,  Grabmann,  E.,  &  Ennsgraber,  C. (2015).  Entrepreneurial  implications  of crowdfunding    as    alternative    funding source  for  innovations. Venture  Capital, 17(1-2), 171-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2015.1037132
  21. Li,  H.,  Daugherty,  T.,  &  Biocca,  F.  (2001).  Char-acteristics  of  virtual  experience  in  elec-tronic   commerce:   A   protocol   analysis. Journal of Interactive Marketing,15(3), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.1013
  22. Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfund-ing: An exploratory study. Journal of busi-ness venturing, 29(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
  23. Mollick,  E.  R.,  &  Kuppuswamy,  V.  (2014).  After the campaign: Outcomes of crowdfunding. UNC Kenan-Flagler Research Paper, (2376997). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2376997or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2376997
  24. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academic    Management    Re-view, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
  25. Nucciarelli,  Li,  F.,  Fernandes,  K.  J.,  Goumagias, N.,  Cabras,  I.,  Devlin,  S.,  Kudenko,  D.,  & Cowling,  P.  (2017).  From  value  chains  to technological   platforms:   The   effects   of crowdfunding  in  the  digital  game  indus-try. Journal of Business Research, 78, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.030
  26. Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M., & Parasura-man,  A.  (2011).  Crowd-funding:  trans-forming customers into investors through innovative  service  platforms. Journal  of Service    Management, 22(4),    443-470. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111155079
  27. Parra, J. F., Valencia-Arias, A., & Bermúdez-Her-nández,  J.  (2023).  The  venture  creation process  and  entrepreneurial  intention  in emerging  economies–a system dynamic’s approach. Journal  of  Entrepreneurship  in Emerging  Economies, 15(5),  1215-1246. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-02-2021-0048
  28. Perrini, F., Vurro, C., & Costanzo, L. A. (2010). A process-based   view   of   social   entrepre-neurship: From opportunity identification to  scaling-up  social  change  in  the  case  of San  Patrignano. Entrepreneurship  &  Re-gional     Development, 22(6),     515-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2010.488402.
  29. Seawright,  J.,  &  Gerring,  J.  (2008).  Case  selec-tion  techniques  in  case  study  research:  A menu  of  qualitative  and  quantitative  op-tions. Political  Research  Quarterly,  61(2), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077
  30. Sontag-Padilla, L.M., Staplefoote, L., & Gonzalez Morganti, K. (2012). Financial sustainabil-ity for nonprofit organizations: A review of the literature. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Cor-poration. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_re-ports/RR121.html
  31. Vergara, R. (2015). Awareness and attitudes to-wards crowdfunding in the Philippines. In 9th Global Business Conference(Vol. 1, pp. 3-5).
  32. Vergara,  R.A.G.  (2019).  Crowdfunding  and  the venture creation process. Philippine Acad-emy    of    Management    E-Journal,    2(1). https://paomassociation.org/paom-e-journal/issues/vol-2-no-1-march-2019/
  33. Vergara,  R.A.G.  &  Vergara,  K.C.S.  (2023).  Why crowdfund?   Motivations   of   Philippine-based  project  owners  and  backers. Inter-national  Journal  of  Multidisciplinary:  Ap-plied   Business   and   Education   Research, 4(5), 1650-1658. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijma-ber.04.05.26.
  34. Yin,  R.K.  (2014). Case  study  research:  Design and methods. Sage publications

Tools


Copyright © 2026  KITE Digital Educational Solutions |  Exclusively distributed by CE-Logic